<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foxx: Hillary and Obama are Socialists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/03/17/foxx-hillary-and-obama-are-socialists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/03/17/foxx-hillary-and-obama-are-socialists/</link>
	<description>Your political road for the Carolinas.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cmitchz</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/03/17/foxx-hillary-and-obama-are-socialists/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>cmitchz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/03/17/foxx-hillary-and-obama-are-socialists/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>"Socialist," like "liberal," is rejected by the left only because it has the negative connotation it deserves.

If Virginia had called them "progressives," which is simply the current code word on the left for "socialists," no one would be up in arms about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Socialist,&#8221; like &#8220;liberal,&#8221; is rejected by the left only because it has the negative connotation it deserves.</p>
<p>If Virginia had called them &#8220;progressives,&#8221; which is simply the current code word on the left for &#8220;socialists,&#8221; no one would be up in arms about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
