I’ll hit these each piece by piece:
“He has increased spending in Charlotte 10 percent a year,” Smith said.
McCrory boasted that he vetoed every property tax increase that came his way, and the only increase was when city council overrode his veto. He said Smith and his fellow legislators cut spending that then requires local governments to fill in the gap.
“They run commercials saying, `I didn’t vote to raise taxes,’ ” McCrory said, “and pass on the burden to local property owners.”
I think this is kind of just useless bickering. Yes, spending has increased in Charlotte at a high rate. Yes, McCrory has vetoed spending and yes, the Democratic controlled City Council has overridden some of it, at times with the help of Republican City Councilmen. McCrory only has so much control over that when the opposition party has a sizable majority. However, I still haven’t heard anything about Pat vetoing the water hike increase. That would certainly send the message that he is committed to keep spending down when in Raleigh.
As far as McCrory accusing the legislature of cutting back funding, I’m not so sure that’s a bad thing. I prefer to see as much local control as possible so that the people using the funding are the ones paying for it rather than money being redistributed throughout the state where some benefit and others do not. Without knowing the specifics of what McCrory was referring to it’s hard to know if his complaint towards Smith is justified.
Smith started the day with a new radio commercial, his first negative ad, criticizing cost overruns in Charlotte’s new Lynx light-rail system.
“North Carolina taxpayers can’t afford Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory,” the ad says. “On McCrory’s watch as mayor, they overspent the budget for light rail by over $200 million.”
The estimated cost of the Lynx Blue Line jumped from $227 million in 1998 to $463 million when it was completed. City officials blamed contractors for much of the overrun and for related design flaws.
The cost of the light rail is a legitimate issue to hit McCrory on and can be damaging to the image he has created for himself that he is conservative on spending. The cost of the rail has more than doubled and critics have long been arguing that ridership of the rail system will come nowhere near meeting the levels to cover the continued costs of maintaining and building it. Furthermore, McCrory was out front and center petitioning to keep the 1/2 cent transit tax, which passed with 70% of the vote
In an interview after the debate, McCrory responded that cost overruns are common in transportation programs, including the state roads built by Smith’s construction company. Of the 16 state road projects completed by Smith’s company since 2004, five have run over budget, according to state Department of Transportation data.
I don’t think five out of 16 is all that big a deal, but what bothers me about this is that Fred Smith’s construction company has a contract with the state of which he is a legislator. Isn’t that a huge conflict of interest?