<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Berry Taking Heat Over Contributions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/10/12/berry-taking-heat-over-contributions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/10/12/berry-taking-heat-over-contributions/</link>
	<description>Your political road for the Carolinas.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terrell</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/10/12/berry-taking-heat-over-contributions/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=3390#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>I forgot to add I heard heard her opponent at a non partisan event say (Donnan) she would do everything she can for unions. hmm now the shoe is on the other foot. Funny how Cherie's opponent is financed by unions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add I heard heard her opponent at a non partisan event say (Donnan) she would do everything she can for unions. hmm now the shoe is on the other foot. Funny how Cherie&#8217;s opponent is financed by unions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrell</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2008/10/12/berry-taking-heat-over-contributions/#comment-3334</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=3390#comment-3334</guid>
		<description>You might have a point except for a couple things.
1) She makes no decisions over the fines and punishments imposed. 
2) Her opponent is also receiving the same donations for the most part.
3) Why swould she give her a opponent such a huge advantage if what she is doing is not illegal or conflict of interest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have a point except for a couple things.<br />
1) She makes no decisions over the fines and punishments imposed.<br />
2) Her opponent is also receiving the same donations for the most part.<br />
3) Why swould she give her a opponent such a huge advantage if what she is doing is not illegal or conflict of interest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
