Nov 08 2009

Republicans, Shuler, Kissell, and McIntyre Voted to Protect Your Liberties Last Night

HR 3962, the infamous Pelosi health care bill passed the U.S. House of Representatives last night by a mere five votes.  This doesn’t mean that we’re doomed.  The U.S. Senate still has their own version to pass and then it has to be reconciled with the House bill and both chambers have to vote on the final combo bill.  It is unlikely this will all happen before the end of the year, so there is time for the American people to stop this.

I want you to understand what this bill does.  It is going to cost in excess of $1.2 trillion over the next ten years.  This is all new spending on top of what our government spends today.  Bear in mind, we have a $1.7 trillion budget deficit this year alone an $11 trillion debt.  It’s actually even worse than that, though.  The $1.2 trillion figure is what the House reps are saying.  The CBO has a much, much larger price tag.

Senator Gregg: Updated CBO Estimate of House Bill Pulls Back the Curtain on Majority’s Intent to Grow Government by $3 Trillion

Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH), ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee today commented on the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) more detailed cost estimate of the manager’s amendment to the House health reform bill.

Senator Gregg stated, “The CBO estimate released last night finally sheds light on the smoke and mirrors game the majority has been playing with the cost of their health care reform proposal. Over the first 10 years, this legislation builds in gross new spending of $1.7 trillion – and most of the new spending doesn’t even start until 2014. Once that spending is fully phased in, the House Democratic bill rings up at more than $3 trillion over ten years.

“Additionally, this bill cuts critical Medicare and Medicaid funding by $628 billion, accounts for nearly $1.2 trillion in tax and fee increases and will explode the scope of government by putting the nation’s health care system in the hands of Washington bureaucrats. The $3 trillion price tag defies common sense – we simply cannot add all this new spending to the government rolls and claim to control the deficit.

“If we continue to pile more and more debt on the next generation, they will never be able to get out from under it. The health care system needs reform, but this massive expansion of government, financed by our children and grandchildren, is the wrong way to proceed.”

This bill will fine employers who do not provide health insurance to their employees.  This is a double edged sword.  Many small business, for one, don’t provide it because they can’t.  Of those companies that do, the fine that would be implemented by the Federal government will actually cost less than providing the benefits.  The obvious result is that many companies out there will simply drop employee health benefits and force them onto the public “option.”  Personally, I think this is by design because the Democrats have been very open about wanting a single payer government run health care system and that is exactly the path we will go down.

This bill will make your current insurance policy even more expensive.  Remember how the whole point of health care “reform” was to lower the cost.  Yeah, that’s out the door.  Taxes on medical devices and supplies as well as on insurance companies and mandates requiring them to cover anyone who walks through the door regardless of age or preexisting conditions will raise the price of your insurance.  This will put many more Americans on the public “option” because they won’t be able to afford the premium increase or their company will stop offering the benefits and just pay the fine.  We are headed towards a two-tiered health care system.  High quality health care for the elite rich of our nation who can afford to pay outside the public “option” and a watered down rationed system for the rest of us.

This bill was 1,990 pages long.  Everyone that voted for this bill doesn’t have the slightest clue what is in it.  They haven’t had it long enough to know and many of them have already admitted that they don’t read the bills anyway.

Probably the most destructive part of this bill is the individual mandate.  Never in the history of our nation, one that prides itself of personal freedom and liberty, has our government passed a law forcing the American people to  buy a product.  This is blatantly unconstitutional and I imagine that if the Senate companion bill passes with the same mandate, which it does possess, and this is signed into law there will be Constitutional challenges to this piece.   I want you to understand the ramifications if such a mandate is held up by the Supreme Court.  Going forward our government will have no limitation of powers.  Once they are told by the highest court in the land that they are allowed to tell us what to buy based upon the court’s interpretation of the Commerce Clause or providing the general welfare, they will have complete control over the American people.  Our nation as we know it today will be a thing of the past.  We are heading into a Soviet style government.  Make no mistake about it.

All Republicans in North and South Carolina voted against this bill.  Democrat Congressmen Larry Kissell, Mike McIntyre, and Heath Shuler also voted against the bill.

The following Democrats voted to throw you in the gulag if you don’t buy health insurance.

  • G. K. Butterfield (NC-01)
  • Bob Etheridge (NC-02)
  • David Price (NC-04)
  • Mel Watt (NC-12)
  • Brad Miller (NC-13)
  • Jack Spratt (SC-05)
  • Jim Clyburn (SC-06)

8 Responses to “Republicans, Shuler, Kissell, and McIntyre Voted to Protect Your Liberties Last Night”

  1. cmitchzon 08 Nov 2009 at 12:09 pm

    The only thing Kissell and Shuler voted to protect was their jobs. God knows little Larry wouldn’t want to go back to raising goats and teaching public school brats again.

    If Kissell ever had any concern about this bill curtailing liberty, then I sure haven’t heard it. Remember, his official excuse was that it took too much away from Medicare; so, beyond that, he must have thought the bill was acceptable.

  2. Bane Windlowon 08 Nov 2009 at 1:02 pm

    They all vote to protect their jobs regardless of their party. There are very few in Washington that will put their reelection at risk for their principles.

  3. voteoutspratton 08 Nov 2009 at 4:47 pm

    Spratt is a spineless, incompetent boob that has been in DC long enough. The man comes back to D5 and makes rambling, mumbling, incoherent speeches and interviews reminiscent of Muammar el-Qaddafi. He caused a room of 700+ to breakout in laughter when he said “I RARELY VOTE AGAINST MY OWN CONSTITUENCY” all the while voting in lockstep with Princess Pelosi 98% of the time. The man is needs to retire or get his “stones” out of Pelosi’ purse and REPRESENT ALL of Dist 5 not just the 2% of the Lunatic Left.

    Source: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/s000749/

  4. Bane Windlowon 08 Nov 2009 at 4:51 pm

    voteoutspratt, I agree and I already have something in the works :wink:

  5. voteoutspratton 08 Nov 2009 at 8:16 pm

    Group I started on Facebook

    Citizens Against the Re-Election of Congressman John Spratt
    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1133732084&ref=profile#/group.php?gid=95860094692

    Group started by another Patriot
    http://groups.google.com/group/ourdistrict5

  6. CountryBoyon 08 Nov 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Bane:

    If you are serious, let the folks at Mick Mulvaney’s campaign know about it. He announced against Spratt this week. He is by far the strongest competition Spratt has faced in years.

    You can find contact info at http://www.MickMulvaney.com

  7. cmitchzon 08 Nov 2009 at 11:29 pm

    Here’s the website for his congressional campaign, currently under construction: http://www.mulvaneyforcongress.com/

  8. Joeon 18 Nov 2009 at 9:56 am

    I especially object to the fact that my tax dollars are being used to bribe members of Congress to secure their votes, or to reward powerful Senators. For instance . . .

    The Baucus bill has the federal government paying the entire cost for the mandated Medicaid expansion in the following states: Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island and Michigan. This is an attempt to bribe or reward the Senators and Representatives from those states using my tax money.

    Other states aren’t getting this sweet deal. Citizens in the other 46 states will have to pay higher taxes to fund this scheme.

    I’m sure the so-called heathcare bill is stuffed with other sweetheart deals, designed to win key votes. You guys call this logrolling. I call it bribery. The only reason Congressional leaders get away with it is because they’re using my tax money to do the bribing, but that makes it worse, not better.

    Frankly, I think any Congressional leader who offers a tax-funded benefit for a state or district in order to secure a vote, and any member of Congress who negotiates to gain such a benefit, should be brought up on charges and go to jail for violating the anti-bribery law.

    The laws are supposed to treat all of us equally. Any law that treats citizens of some states differently is inherently unjust, and any law passed using tax-funded bribery is inherently unethical. I believe the so called healthcare bill is both things, unjust and unethical. VOTE AGAINST IT!

    I’m paying close attention to what David Price does, and will take it into account as I discuss his re-election with other voters. Let’s get these bums OUT in 2010

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply