<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DeMint Introduces Constitutional Amendment for Congressional Term Limits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/10/demint-introduces-constitutional-amendment-for-congressional-term-limits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/10/demint-introduces-constitutional-amendment-for-congressional-term-limits/</link>
	<description>Your political road for the Carolinas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/10/demint-introduces-constitutional-amendment-for-congressional-term-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-9036</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=8595#comment-9036</guid>
		<description>cmitchz:

you say:
&quot;The Republicans’ actual promise in 1994 was to bring term limits to a vote (ie bring it out of committee, something the Democrats would never do). Then a lot of them voted against it once it came up, IIRC. Deceptive, probably, but wording it that way was perhaps the only way to get all of the GOP candidates on board with the Contract.&quot;

And nothing has changed.  What the republicans did was nothing.  Why give them any credit at all.  They DID NOTHING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cmitchz:</p>
<p>you say:<br />
&#8220;The Republicans’ actual promise in 1994 was to bring term limits to a vote (ie bring it out of committee, something the Democrats would never do). Then a lot of them voted against it once it came up, IIRC. Deceptive, probably, but wording it that way was perhaps the only way to get all of the GOP candidates on board with the Contract.&#8221;</p>
<p>And nothing has changed.  What the republicans did was nothing.  Why give them any credit at all.  They DID NOTHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmitchz</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/10/demint-introduces-constitutional-amendment-for-congressional-term-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-8957</link>
		<dc:creator>cmitchz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=8595#comment-8957</guid>
		<description>The Republicans&#039; actual promise in 1994 was to bring term limits to a vote (ie bring it out of committee, something the Democrats would never do).  Then a lot of them voted against it once it came up, IIRC.  Deceptive, probably, but wording it that way was perhaps the only way to get all of the GOP candidates on board with the Contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republicans&#8217; actual promise in 1994 was to bring term limits to a vote (ie bring it out of committee, something the Democrats would never do).  Then a lot of them voted against it once it came up, IIRC.  Deceptive, probably, but wording it that way was perhaps the only way to get all of the GOP candidates on board with the Contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Lee Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/10/demint-introduces-constitutional-amendment-for-congressional-term-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-8949</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Lee Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=8595#comment-8949</guid>
		<description>The only infallible, unstoppable, guaranteed way to get a truly new Congress is :
NEVER REELECT ANY INCUMBENT! AND DO IT EVERY ELECTION!

 Don&#039;t let anyone serve more than one term. Some of the reasons to do this:

• It gives us a one-term-limited Congress without using amendments
• It encourages ordinary citizens to run for Congress 
• It would be supported by 70% of the country who want term limits for Congress
• It is completely nonpartisan
• If repeated, it ends career politicians in Congress
• It opens the way to a “citizen Congress”
* It would open a torrent of fresh ideas to improve our government
• It ends the seniority system that keeps freshmen powerless
• It doesn’t cost money. But you MUST vote! Just don’t vote for an incumbent
• It is the only guaranteed, infallible, unstoppable way to “Throw the Bums Out”
• It takes effect immediately on Election Day
• If it doesn’t work, do it again and again! It will work eventually

NEVER REELECT ANYONE IN CONGRESS. AND DO IT EVERY ELECTION!

nelson lee walker of tenurecorrupts.com
send for your free NEVER REELECT bumper sticker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only infallible, unstoppable, guaranteed way to get a truly new Congress is :<br />
NEVER REELECT ANY INCUMBENT! AND DO IT EVERY ELECTION!</p>
<p> Don&#8217;t let anyone serve more than one term. Some of the reasons to do this:</p>
<p>• It gives us a one-term-limited Congress without using amendments<br />
• It encourages ordinary citizens to run for Congress<br />
• It would be supported by 70% of the country who want term limits for Congress<br />
• It is completely nonpartisan<br />
• If repeated, it ends career politicians in Congress<br />
• It opens the way to a “citizen Congress”<br />
* It would open a torrent of fresh ideas to improve our government<br />
• It ends the seniority system that keeps freshmen powerless<br />
• It doesn’t cost money. But you MUST vote! Just don’t vote for an incumbent<br />
• It is the only guaranteed, infallible, unstoppable way to “Throw the Bums Out”<br />
• It takes effect immediately on Election Day<br />
• If it doesn’t work, do it again and again! It will work eventually</p>
<p>NEVER REELECT ANYONE IN CONGRESS. AND DO IT EVERY ELECTION!</p>
<p>nelson lee walker of tenurecorrupts.com<br />
send for your free NEVER REELECT bumper sticker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/10/demint-introduces-constitutional-amendment-for-congressional-term-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=8595#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>Bane:

You hit the nail on the head: it’s got zero chance of ever seeing the light of day. 

This is one of those disingenuous bills that come and go that allow politicians to appear to be &#039;doing something&#039; (fighting &#039;corruption&#039;, reducing taxes/the deficit, supporting the troops) but, in the end, allows the corruption to continue, the spending to go on, business as usual.  The politician gets to go home knowing full well it is, at best, posturing.  He benefits himself, of course, in sponsoring or voting for this sort of legislation by the support given him (votes, money etc.) by those who believe these politicians actually intended to change things:  the naive, the ignorant, the unthinking and the blind partisan.

Let&#039;s see the sponsors of the bill step down after their &#039;term limit&#039; is up, voluntarily.  You don&#039;t need to pass legislation to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bane:</p>
<p>You hit the nail on the head: it’s got zero chance of ever seeing the light of day. </p>
<p>This is one of those disingenuous bills that come and go that allow politicians to appear to be &#8216;doing something&#8217; (fighting &#8216;corruption&#8217;, reducing taxes/the deficit, supporting the troops) but, in the end, allows the corruption to continue, the spending to go on, business as usual.  The politician gets to go home knowing full well it is, at best, posturing.  He benefits himself, of course, in sponsoring or voting for this sort of legislation by the support given him (votes, money etc.) by those who believe these politicians actually intended to change things:  the naive, the ignorant, the unthinking and the blind partisan.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see the sponsors of the bill step down after their &#8216;term limit&#8217; is up, voluntarily.  You don&#8217;t need to pass legislation to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
