<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Carolina Texting Ban Starts Tuesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/29/north-carolina-texting-ban-starts-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/29/north-carolina-texting-ban-starts-tuesday/</link>
	<description>Your political road for the Carolinas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/29/north-carolina-texting-ban-starts-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-9420</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=8720#comment-9420</guid>
		<description>Logic:

Missing the point is part of not thinking about the whole. 

 In and of itself, texting while driving is as dangerous as drinking and driving.  What don&#039;t you get?  This is not a government &#039;intrusion&#039; against a &#039;right&#039;.  It&#039;s like putting up a guard rail or installing a traffic light at an intersection where many accidents have occurred and, statistically, will occur again, and is intended to prevent needless accidents due to a very bad and well-known habit.  It&#039;s a preventative measure.  The other acts you mention are irrelevant as the legislation was about texting and driving.  They are points of interest but not the end-goal of the legislation. 

Cell phones are a fairly useless luxury.  We accord them too much of our time and our interest for our own good, and to our detriment, at times. 

 You cannot idiot-proof the world but we can hold people responsible for their actions.  This legislation does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logic:</p>
<p>Missing the point is part of not thinking about the whole. </p>
<p> In and of itself, texting while driving is as dangerous as drinking and driving.  What don&#8217;t you get?  This is not a government &#8216;intrusion&#8217; against a &#8216;right&#8217;.  It&#8217;s like putting up a guard rail or installing a traffic light at an intersection where many accidents have occurred and, statistically, will occur again, and is intended to prevent needless accidents due to a very bad and well-known habit.  It&#8217;s a preventative measure.  The other acts you mention are irrelevant as the legislation was about texting and driving.  They are points of interest but not the end-goal of the legislation. </p>
<p>Cell phones are a fairly useless luxury.  We accord them too much of our time and our interest for our own good, and to our detriment, at times. </p>
<p> You cannot idiot-proof the world but we can hold people responsible for their actions.  This legislation does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bane Windlow</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/29/north-carolina-texting-ban-starts-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-9322</link>
		<dc:creator>Bane Windlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=8720#comment-9322</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think the number of people engaging in this will be reduced.  To what extent, who knows?  To your point, there are a lot of bad habits and frankly most of them could just fall under reckless driving, but I find this one to be particularly dangerous compared to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think the number of people engaging in this will be reduced.  To what extent, who knows?  To your point, there are a lot of bad habits and frankly most of them could just fall under reckless driving, but I find this one to be particularly dangerous compared to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logic Connection</title>
		<link>http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/2009/11/29/north-carolina-texting-ban-starts-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-9304</link>
		<dc:creator>Logic Connection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/?p=8720#comment-9304</guid>
		<description>Looks like you beat me to posting about this, Bane.  I&#039;m kind of surprised by your enthusiasm for this latest intrusion into our lives by government though.  Do you really believe that the number of people who choose to text while driving is going to be reduced simply because a law is passed?  Texting while driving is stupid and possibly dangerous, agreed, but couldn&#039;t a similar argument be made for changing radio stations while driving, applying makeup while driving, eating or drinking while driving, just to name a few other distractions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you beat me to posting about this, Bane.  I&#8217;m kind of surprised by your enthusiasm for this latest intrusion into our lives by government though.  Do you really believe that the number of people who choose to text while driving is going to be reduced simply because a law is passed?  Texting while driving is stupid and possibly dangerous, agreed, but couldn&#8217;t a similar argument be made for changing radio stations while driving, applying makeup while driving, eating or drinking while driving, just to name a few other distractions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
