Aug 20 2010
Marshall Lies About Burr’s Social Security Stance
Elaine Marshall is out there telling quite a whopper about Senator Richard Burr’s positions on the issues. You might have noticed that about two weeks ago President Obama suddenly started chiming in about how Democrats need to retain control of Congress to keep Republicans from privatizing Social Security. You may have also asked yourself, where in the hell did that come from? Nobody in the GOP has been talking about taking up this issue. Obama completely invented it and members of his party are now following him in kind. Enter Elaine Marshall.
Marshall “tweeted” this comment a few days ago:
I will always protect Social Security, and fight against @BurrforSenate’s risky scheme to privatize it: http://cot.ag/a1Hcnv #ncSEN #p2
What risky scheme is Senator Burr conjuring up? Well, that’s just it. He isn’t. Tootsie is quoting a comment recently made to a newspaper by Burr where he said he does not plan on doing anything different if he is reelected. Because Burr supported President Bush’s partial privatization plan of Social Security in 2005, she makes quite a stretch to connect his comments in the newspaper to some imaginary conspiracy to privatize Social Security. It’s a flat out lie. That aside, Bush never tried to privatize Social Security. He wanted to offer workers under 55 the option of investing 4% of their FICA taxes in a private account.
Richard Burr has been adequate Senator at best, not bad, but certainly not what I would consider to be all that stellar either. That Elaine Marshall and the President have to resort to the same old Social Security fearmongering to try and scare old people into voting for them again is a sign of their desperation. The American people are rolling out the guillotine for them on November 2nd and they know it.
It’s been known for a long time now that Social Security is on a crash course with insolvency. In fact, it’s in the red for the first time this year. The Baby Boomers are starting to retire and there are far more of them and the prior generation who will be collecting from the program than there have been in the past. There aren’t enough younger workers contributing to this Ponzi Scheme to keep it afloat. So what does Elaine Marshal propose to do then to protect it? The answer is absolutely nothing.
In this campaign, I’ve outlined my plan to protect Social Security:
- Fight against cuts – ensure seniors get the full benefits they deserve
- Protect hard working folks by fighting against raising the retirement age
- Tell Washington to stop raiding the Social Security Trust Fund
She doesn’t want any cuts and she doesn’t want to raise the retirement age even though people are living far longer than they were 75 years ago when the program began. As far as the alleged trust fund, that was raided years ago. It’s gone. So what’s left? Raising the FICA tax? It’s already 15%. Why shouldn’t the Baby Boomers get their coming benefits cut? It was they, after all, who voted for all of these politicians year after year who raided all of their Social Security dollars so it would seem to me they are just realizing the fruits of their very poor voting decisions.
The bottom line is Marshall supports the status quo, which will end in a fiscal boondoggle, and to deflect from that she is dispatching the typical Social Security Bogeyman that her party drums up every election year. Nothing new to see here.
Share




