Archive for the 'Environment' Category

Jul 25 2010

Cap and Tax Dead? Eh…. Not So Fast

A few days ago opponents of the climate change legislation affectionately known as Cap and Trade were rejoicing at the announcement from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) that the job killing, economy destroying proposal had been shelved.  Good news, yes?  Overall, sure.  Stagnation is certainly better than inching forward, however, for those who think it won’t be resurrected, think again.

U.S. Senator John Kerry said Democrats may take up his comprehensive climate-change bill in a lame-duck session after the November elections, while calling on President Barack Obama to escalate his advocacy for the measure.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid yesterday introduced a more limited energy bill that doesn’t include a cap on greenhouse gas emissions, citing the lack of support for a broader bill.

The bigger measure “is not dead,” Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital With Al Hunt” airing this weekend. “If it is after the election, it may well be that some members are free and liberated and feeling that they can take a risk or do something.”

Bloomberg

Ta-dah!  This year’s lame duck session has long been a fear of mine and I’m afraid that Senator Kerry (D-MA) is correct.  They could very well pass the bill after the November elections if they manage to peel away one Republican in the Senate to join them and give them the 60 votes they need to break a filibuster.  Our own Lindsey Graham right here in South Carolina has had his nose planted firmly up the behinds of Senators Kerry and Lieberman (I-CT) over this proposal.  Multiple polling of the issue has shown that the American people are pretty firmly against Cap and Trade, but the majority also opposed ObamaCare and that didn’t stop them from ramming it down our throats.

A poll recently commissioned by the American Petroleum Institute shows that 67% of North Carolinians oppose new taxes on the oil and natural gas industry. Of that 67%, 46% strongly opposed the idea.  That’s a solid rejection of what is trying to be pushed on us by those in the Federal government all in the name of a theory compromised by lies and distortions.

“Voters know raising taxes on an industry that provides most of their energy and supports more than 9.2 million jobs would hurt them and damage the economy,” said API President and CEO Jack Gerard. “Raising taxes doesn’t address their major concern, which is putting people back to work.”

Energy Tomorrow

It’s a boneheaded time to be pushing this kind of proposal onto the American people when unemployment is in the teens around the country.  Even if unemployment were at historic lows, Cap and Trade is a bad idea because it would have negative economical effects on our nation in order to satiate the appetites of those who believe in man made global warming, which I firmly believe is nothing but junk science.

Americans want a robust economy and replenished jobs and this is part of the reason why this current Congress is taking such a beating right now.  Instead of addressing the needs of their constituents, they are too busy quenching their own ideological thirsts.

Share

3 responses so far

Jul 01 2010

Environmental/Labor Groups Run Ad Against Burr

A coalition of four environmental, labor and veterans groups began airing an ad today showing an oil-covered man – identified as Burr – being pulled out of the ocean like a sea bird. The man in the suit is shown being cleaned in a rescue operation, reports Rob Christensen.

Under the Dome

The irony here is that these groups probably also supported President Obama in his 2008 presidential campaign and he received more donations from BP than any other American politician.

The Burr campaign noted that Burr had just introduced legislation that would encourage the country to become less oil dependent through tax policies to encourage nuclear power, electric vehicles and natural gas vehicles.

“If the groups running this ad would stop long enough to realize that Senator Burr just introduced an energy bill that has the greatest offset on emissions, they might not have wasted so much money,” said Samantha Smith, Burr’s campaign spokeswoman.

Share

No responses yet

Jun 22 2010

South Carolina Election Predictions for Tonight

Today is the run off for both states’ primaries.  I don’t think we’re going to see any surprises today in any of the races.  Celtic already weighed on North Carolina.  Here are my thoughts for South Carolina tonight.

In the gubernatorial race Nikki Haley is going to win this hands down.  I don’t think anybody in the political world anywhere is expecting otherwise.  Haley will bring the necessary reform needed to Columbia.  I’ll be voting for her today and I have confidence she will be our next governor.

In the First Congressional district I see Charleston State Representative Tim Scott emerging as the winner this evening.  Scott almost doubled the amount of votes that Thurmond received in the primary and he seems to have the momentum behind him.

The Third Congressional race is a tough one to guess.  Both State Representative Jeff Duncan and Richard Cash finished pretty close in the primary.  I think this could teeter either way, but my hopes are on Duncan.  He has a proven record of fiscal responsibility in Columbia.

In the Fourth Congressional district I think Bob Inglis will be singing his swan song tonight.  It would be quite remarkable for an incumbent who faced several challenges last term and then finished second in this term’s election and forced into a run off to end up winning.  Inglis blew it when he embraced climate change legislation, which would shackle the American economy.  With real unemployment in the teens, this is a kick in the ass we don’t need.  Inglis’s district doesn’t support this nonsense and he forgot that he was sent to Washington to represent the voters, not his personal superstitions.   Trey Gowdy will prevail this evening.

For the State Education Superintendent I’ll be voting for Mick Zais and I also think he will emerge as the winner tonight.  I like Zais’s proposal to bring discipline back into the classroom.  God, is that ever needed.  I had actually considered becoming a teacher when I was younger, but then realized that with my disposition I would end up back handing some kid who smarted off to me in class and then I’d get fired and probably sued by his rotten parents, so I chose a different path in life, that of political agitator.

Additionally, we have some incumbent state representatives who are hoping to hang on tonight.  State Representatives Joey Millwood (R-Landrum), Marion Frye (R-Leesville), Boyd Brown (D-Winnsboro) and Richard Chalk (R-Hilton Head Island) were all forced into today’s run off.   Also here in York County I am pulling for Kyle Boyd to win the First County Council district and for Britt Blackwell to overthrow Buddy Motz in the Sixth.

Share

No responses yet

Jun 11 2010

Bad Bill of the Week (June 11th)

Civitas heats up:

Sponsored by Reps. Pricey Harrison (D-Guilford), Alice Graham Underhill (D-Craven) and Winkie Wilkins (D-Person), HB1807 is a resolution entitled “Support Federal Climate Change Legislation.”  The resolution is full of claims perpetuated by the same false science that fuels the insanity of global warming alarmists everywhere.

The resolution calls for federal legislation that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, most likely in the form of carbon taxes or some form of cap and trade, which will cause energy prices to skyrocket. 

This bill requests legislation that is antithetical to free-market and limited-government principles; it requests wealth redistribution, increased energy costs resulting from market manipulation, higher taxes and suggests that North Carolina may take action to “control carbon emissions.”

Share

One response so far

Jun 04 2010

Republicans Have Lost Their Love for Lindsey

If Lindsey Graham were up for reelection to the U.S. Senate this year, he’d be riding down a rocky road. According to the poll taken by Public Policy Polling, Graham would be in line to follow the same fate as his colleagues, Senators Bob Bennett (R-UT) and Arlen Specter (D-PA) who were both defeated in their state’s primaries within the past month. Only 40% of likely Republican primary voters in South Carolina approve of Graham’s job performance, while 45% disapprove. 64% of conservative Republicans and 18% of moderates think Graham is too liberal.

Gee, can’t imagine why. Maybe it’s his unabashed support of Cap and Fraud and his dedication to amnesty for illegal immigrants? The only real mystery here is where in the hell all of these disenfranchised Republicans were two years ago when Graham was actually up for reelection.

Share

3 responses so far

May 23 2010

It’s Baaaaaaack… Bad Bill of the Week Returns

Civitas continues to keep an eye on our elected clowns, and explains why not all tax exemptions are good.

House Bill 1668, “An Act to Exempt From Sales and Use Tax the Purchase of Products Entirely Composed of Recycled Materials” is set to be introduced during the current legislative session of the General Assembly. 

Just before the start of this year’s legislative session, Senate and House Democrats estimated that between $800 million and $1 billion in additional revenue or spending cuts would be needed to balance the budget for the start of the fiscal year in July.  Considering this news, one would probably expect the state to not be as charitable this year in offering North Carolinians tax credits or other programs that would further reduce the amount of generated revenue.  When it comes to legislative politics, however, one must throw all semblance of common sense out the window.

This bill would actually narrow the sales-tax base by exempting more products, making it counterproductive to a stable source of revenue, and winner of the Civitas Institute “Bad Bill of the Week.”

Share

One response so far

May 11 2010

We the People Not We the Plovers

I have been vacationing in Rodanthe this week. As I was driving down Cape Hatteras yesterday I was greeted with these signs as I entered into Buxton. Apparently, the enviro-weenies have really ticked some people off.

Senate Bill 1557, the Preserving Public Access to Cape Hatteras Beaches Act of 2009, was sponsored by Senator Richard Burr last August in order to reinstate off road vehicle use on the Hatteras seashore.  The Defenders of Wildlife and the National Audubon Society sued the state in 2007 to prevent such access until a management plan has been devised as required by an Executive Order issued by President Richard Nixon in 1972. A lot of recreational use of the beaches has been prevented since the lawsuit three years ago and it has apparently upset some of the locals.

Share

8 responses so far

May 07 2010

Grahamnesty Says No Support for Climate Bill

Who would have thought that something as disastrous as the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico could yield something positive?  Lindsey Grahamnesty claims that there is now not enough support for a climate bill because of the oil spill.  You see, there are incentives in the Tax and Fraud bill that Graham has been working on with Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) to expand offshore drilling.  Since the oil spill the environmental crowd is now crowing louder and many members of Congress are shying away from supporting more drilling, as if we have never had an oil spill before nor will in the future.

Yes, the oil spill is bad and I am as disturbed by it as the next guy, but it’s not a reason for us to once again put off embracing the use of our own resources.  The bottom line is we can cast aside offshore drilling for another 20 years all over again, but China and Russia aren’t going to stop extracting oil from the Gulf and their record on safety when it comes to just about anything aren’t exactly stellar.

Share

One response so far

Apr 26 2010

Yes, They’ve Done it Again

Atlantic hurricanes will be more active than usual this year, N.C. State University researchers said today.

The year should see 15 to 18 named storms in the Atlantic basin, which includes the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean, said Lian Xie and collaborators Montserrat Fuentes and Danny Modlin. An average of nine to 11 named storms a year have formed over the past half-century.

Charlotte Observer

Isn’t this like the fifth year in a row now that meteorologists and climatologists have predicted a more hectic hurricane season than normal?  Every year since Katrina anyway, and every year the season has trotted by like a lamb.  I guess if they just keep repeating the same thing over and over each year eventually it’ll happen and then they’ll be able to add it to their “evidence” of global “warming.”

Share

One response so far

Apr 26 2010

Graham in a Huff Over Immigration Bill Precedence

Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-S.C.) decision to walk away from Senate talks on climate change and energy legislation – at least for now – has prompted the measure’s remaining architects to scuttle Monday’s planned unveiling of the bill.

Graham is upset over Democratic plans to take up immigration legislation this year – he accuses Democratic leaders of pushing forward immigration “haphazardly” and calls it an election-year political gambit.

Kerry praised Graham’s work on the climate effort and expressed hope that he would rejoin the initiative “once the politics of immigration are resolved,” but vowed to press ahead one way or the other.

The Hill

Graham is such a fraud.  Who does he think he is fooling?  He has as much of a hard on for giving away citizenship to millions of illegal immigrant lawbreakers as he does for destroying our nation’s economy with Cap and Trade.  Are we really supposed to believe he is going to walk away from Tax and Fraud just because the White House wants to try and jam amnesty through as a knee jerk reaction to Arizona’s new law cracking down on illegals?  Graham has bought the whole junk climate science hook, line, and sinker and he’ll be right there with his nose up John Kerry’s behind when they’re ready to push forward with it.  That’s after he surrenders our nation to the Mexican invasion, of course.

Share

No responses yet

Apr 15 2010

Dems Debate Best Ways to Screw America Up Even More

Sorry, was that a biased headline? Ooops.

Anyways, the Democrats hoping to take on Richard Burr got together for a little debate the other night. I didn’t watch it because I’m already severely depressed and watching it would have probably driven me over the edge. I’ve read the reports though, and one of the interesting things I’ve noticed is that some of Cal Cunningham’s opponents must be CPO readers.

Straight outta Bane Windlow’s mouth to your ears, Ann.

No Democrat debate would be complete without someone saying something astoundingly, brain-numbingly stupid. This evening it was Cunningham, who appears to be so desperate to prove he loves Gaia, he’s pulling lies out of his ass right on stage:

Cunningham’s Gollum-esque answers on offshore drilling haven’t scared away the Sierra Club- they endorsed him on Thursday, prompting Ken Lewis to pitch a fit:

Share

One response so far

Mar 31 2010

Obama to Call for Offshore Drilling

In yet another staunch reversal of one of Obama’s campaign promises, he has now had an epiphany, much to the chagrin of environmental extremists, and will allegedly call for an end to the moratorium of offshore drilling off the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.  MSNBC is reporting that this announcement will come today and call for drilling off the coasts of Virginia and the continental shelf in the south.  This could be a nice boon to the Carolinas if we are included in this proposal and bring a lot of jobs and wealth to the area.

I wonder if Obama is extending an olive branch to the right in order to improve his sinking poll numbers after pissing off over half the country with his unconstitutional health care deform.

Share

4 responses so far

Mar 10 2010

Obama Executive Order Could Decimate Carolina Fishing Industry

The Obama administration will accept no more public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing some of the nation’s oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters.

This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is “fluid” and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn’t issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.

That’s a disappointment, but not really a surprise for fishing industry insiders who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force. These angling advocates have come to suspect that public input into the process was a charade from the beginning.

ESPN

Of course it was a charade. Obama doesn’t give a damn about what the public thinks about anything. He’s demonstrated that pretty consistently throughout the past year.

So what is the point of this? The states have been managing the use of their waterways with little to no problem for over 200 years. Well, it turns out that this whole unconstitutional power grab is being orchestrated by the radical left environmental movement.

As ESPN previously reported, WWF, Greenpeace, Defenders of Wildlife, Pew Environment Group and others produced a document entitled “Transition Green” shortly after Obama was elected in 2008. What has happened since suggests that the task force has been in lockstep with that position paper.

Then in late summer, just after he created the task force, these groups produced “Recommendations for the Adoption and Implementation of an Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes National Policy.” This document makes repeated references to “overfishing,” but doesn’t once reference recreational angling, its importance, and its benefits, both to participants and the resource.

Additionally, some of these same organizations have revealed their anti-fishing bias by playing fast and loose with “facts,” in attempts to ban tackle containing lead in the United States and Canada.

That same tunnel vision, in which recreational angling and commercial fishing are indiscriminately lumped together as harmful to the resource, has persisted with the task force, despite protests by the angling industry.

As more evidence of collusion, the green groups began clamoring for an Executive Order to implement the task force’s recommendations even before the public comment period ended in February. Fishing advocates had no idea that this was coming.

The commercial and recreational fishing industries have already been taking a big hit in both North and South Carolina and the last thing we need is further encroachment by the Federal government.  The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has already exhibited plenty of incompetence in the way it enforces U.S. fisheries laws such to the effect that Congressman Walter Jones (R-NC-03) has called for a halt to all prosecutions of fishermen by the NOAA and a complete overhaul of how the laws are enforced.

Morlock fears that “what we’re seeing coming at us is an attempted dismantling of the science-based fish and wildlife model that has served us so well. There’s no basis in science for the agendas of these groups who are trying to push the public out of being able to fish and recreate.

“Conflicts (user) are overstated and problems are manufactured. It’s all just an excuse to put us off the water.”

In the wake of the task force’s framework document, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF) and its partners in the U.S. Recreational Fishing & Boating Coalition against voiced their concerns to the administration.

“Some of the potential policy implications of this interim framework have the potential to be a real threat to recreational anglers who not only contribute billions of dollars to the economy and millions of dollars in tax revenues to support fisheries conservation, but who are also the backbone of the American fish and wildlife conservation ethic,” said CSF President Jeff Crane.

Morlock, a member of the CSF board, added, “There are over one million jobs in America supported coast to coast by recreational fishing. The task force has not included any accountability requirements in their reports for evaluating or mitigating how the new policies they are drafting will impact the fishing industry or related economies.

“Given that the scope of this process appears to include a new set of policies for all coastal and inland waters of the United States, the omission of economic considerations is inexcusable.”

This is not the only access issue threatening the public’s right to fish, but it definitely is the most serious, according to Chris Horton, national conservation director for BASS.

“With what’s being created, the same principles could apply inland as apply to the oceans,” he said. “Under the guise of ‘marine spatial planning’ entire watersheds could be shut down, even 2,000 miles up a river drainage from the ocean.

“Every angler needs to be aware because if it’s not happening in your backyard today or tomorrow, it will be eventually.

This is what happens when you put an out of touch ideologue beholden to radical special interests in the highest office in the land. The fact that Obama intends to implement this with an Executive Order completely bypassing Congress gives credence to the accusation that he is becoming an elected dictator, much like Hugo Chavez.

This won’t be used to just regulate fishing either. Rest assured that the bureaucratic entities created to manage all of this will also be used to thwart any oil or natural gas exploration off our coastal waters, thus effectively reinstating the Federal drilling ban that just expired less than two years ago.

There is already talk of a ban on bottom fishing all the way down the North and South Carolina coasts to Georgia.  Thousands of jobs in these states can potentially be effected by this at a time when they are experiencing double digit unemployment rates. That aside, there is also the element of this being yet another chipping away at the block of individual freedom and liberty that Americans have enjoyed for over two centuries and that the President and this Congress spit on daily.

If this is put into place it seems like El Presidente will get to decide when and where you go fishing. With the industry being so large I am hoping this will end up in the Supreme Court with a Constitutional challenge if Obama makes good on this move.

Share

7 responses so far

Mar 04 2010

DeMint: White House Preparing Government Land Grab

Using the Antiquities Act, President Carter locked up more land than any other president had before him, taking more than 50 million acres in Alaska despite strong opposition from the state.

President Clinton used the authority 22 times to prohibit hunting, recreational vehicles, mining, forestry and even grazing in 5.9 million acres scattered around the country. The law allowed him to single-handedly create 19 new national monuments and expand three others without consulting anyone.

One of the monuments President Clinton created was the Grande Staircase-Escalante in Utah, where 135,000 acres of land were leased for oil and gas and about 65,000 barrels of oil were produced each year from five active wells. But, President Clinton put an end to developing those resources.

President Obama could do the same in other energy-rich places unless Congress takes action. At least 13.5 million acres are already on his Department of Interior’s real estate shopping list.

This includes a 58,000-acre area in New Mexico. The memo said this should be done so the lesser prairie chicken and the sand dune lizard will be better protected. Are these animals going extinct? No. The bureaucrats wrote that the land should be locked up to “avoid the necessity of listing either of these species as threatened or endangered.”

In Nevada, the Obama administration might make another monument in the Heart of the Great Basin because it, supposedly, is a “center of climate change scientific research.”

In Colorado, the government is considering designating the Vermillion Basin as a monument because it is “currently under the threat of oil and gas development.”

Americans should be wary of any plans a president has to seize land from the states without their consent. Any new plans to take away states’ freedom to use land as they see fit must be stopped.

That’s why I sponsored an amendment to block Mr. Obama from declaring any of the 14 lands listed in the memo as “monuments.” Unfortunately, the Senate, led by Democrats, rejected it on Thursday evening by a vote of 58-38.

Read more at The Washington Times

The Antiquities Act of 1906 was signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt (R) initially to stop the raping of American Indian artifacts in the southwest.  It gave the President the power by executive order to declare any government owned public land as restricted.  The problem is that it’s since been used over 100 times since its conception and one person should not be allowed to have that kind of authority.  The Office of President was purposely made weak by the Founders for a reason.

I can see instances in which the Federal government may need to restrict public land use at times, but that should be done by a vote of the full Congress so that there is input from the American people.  The proposals shouldn’t be sealed away in a secret document and then carried forth through executive order by one man.  That’s simply not the way America was designed to work.

Share

4 responses so far

Mar 02 2010

Graham Says Cap and Trade Dead, But Eyes Transportation Tax

But Senator Joseph Lieberman, an independent working with Graham and Kerry, said a detailed outline of a bill could come within days and that it will have to include a ceiling on greenhouse gas emissions that drops in future years.

Last June, the House narrowly passed a climate change bill with cap-and-trade as its centerpiece and a carbon-reduction target of 17 percent by 2020, from 2005 levels.

But the initiative has stalled in the Senate, despite Senate Environment and Public Works Committee approval of a similar bill.

But, as a result of work in the past few months, Kerry said he was feeling “more confident” that a climate change bill could be presented to the Senate for passage this year.

“We’re looking at a new way of coming at this that we think can attract greater support,” Kerry said.

Environmentalists have speculated the bill the senators will produce could take a “sectoral approach” by imposing a new carbon-pricing mechanism on utilities, which account for about 40 percent of the emissions blamed for global warming.

Sources also have said there is talk of a transportation tax. Pollution controls on manufacturers could be put off for a few years to give time for more affordable alternative energy sources to come on line, they have said.

Reuters

I would really like to wonder exactly when it was that someone beat Lindsey Graham with the stupid stick because that guy has nothing but shit for brains.  A transportation tax?  It’s not clear as to what exactly that would entail, but one thing is for certain.  The result will not be good for South Carolina.  Any tax on transportation, but whether its an increase in the gas tax, a tax on transportation companies, on the airlines, etc is going to smack everyone in this state in their back pocket.  A tax on truckers transporting goods would be absolutely criminal because it would cause prices to rise in just about every sector, socking the poor and the middle class harder than anyone.

And yet Graham can’t figure out why he keeps getting booed when he speaks around his own state, oblivious to the fact he is alienating his own constituents in the name of junk science.

Share

No responses yet

Feb 25 2010

Sanford Threatens to Sue Over Yucca Mountain

COLUMBIA — Gov. Mark Sanford said Tuesday that President Barack Obama’s decision to abandon a decades-old plan for Nevada’s Yucca Mountain could cost South Carolina $1.2 billion and leave the permanent storage of thousands of tons of nuclear waste in question, and the governor is prepared to sue over it.

Sanford urged Obama to back off his Feb. 1 decision and stick to the 23-year bipartisan compact to use the Nevada facility as a resting ground for the country’s nuclear waste, including 4,000 metric tons temporarily housed at the Savannah River Site and elsewhere in South Carolina.

The two-term Republican governor said Obama was motivated to reverse course as a way to ensure U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s re-election in Nevada.

The president decided to eliminate all funding for the facility and withdraw its license application with the U.S. Department of Energy.

The Post and Courier

The Yucca Mountain nuclear storage containment site is something that I happen to know a bit about.  My father lived back in Las Vegas during the 1990s and worked on this project for a government contractor.  There is absolutely nothing unsafe about this containment facility nor does it pose any threat to the people of Nevada.  The Yucca Mountain is over an hour away from Vegas and in the middle of friggin nowhere.

I agree with Sanford that this all a political ploy by Obama.  He’s willing to cost our state over a billion dollars and throw billions more away to try and save Harry Reid’s political carcass which has already started rotting and sticking up the place.  Of course people in Nevada have protested against it.  Nobody wants to have nuclear waste in their backyard, but that isn’t happening in Nevada nor would it if the Yucca Mountain project were to commence again.  The bulk of the outcry is based on ignorance.

That move by Obama contradicts his claim that he is suddenly supportive of nuclear power.  How can he says he wants to see more nuclear power plants built while simultaneously shutting down one of the major nuclear storage projects in the country?  He can’t have it both ways.

Share

One response so far

Feb 23 2010

Freedom Works Organizing Greenville Protest of Lindsey Graham

The organizers at Freedom Works, like most of us in South Carolina, are rightly peeved with Senator Grahamnesty over his support of Cap and Trade which would not be in the best interest of our state and which he is supposed to be representing first and foremost.  This rolls right along with what I wrote about just a few days ago.  They are organizing a protest this Saturday in Greenville.

South Carolinians are tired of Senator Lindsey Graham’s support for “cap and trade.” For some reason Sen. Graham thinks that imposing a massive tax increase on our energy supply is a good idea. He has been partnering with left-wing senators to come up with a plan that would be devastating to our economy and would increase the cost of energy for all consumers. If you are like us, you have had enough of Sen. Graham’s position on cap and trade.

Please join us as we gather together this Saturday, Feb. 27th to send a message to him that we dissapprove of his stance on this important issue. We will be gathering to write letters to Sen. Graham, and then we will hand deliver them to his district office in Greenville. After that, we will protest his support of cap and trade outside his office.

Here are the details of the events:

9:00am FreedomWorks breakfast and letter-writing at Soby’s restaurant
22 East Court St, Greenville, SC 29601
Map

10:30am Protest outside Sen. Graham’s downtown office
130 South Main St., 7th Floor, Greenville, SC 29601
Map

To rsvp for this event, please contact FreedomWorks regional director Allen Page at a.page@mindspring.com or 336-213-1167. You can also click here to rsvp online. We hope you can join us this weekend on the first anniversary of the tea party protests!

Share

No responses yet

Feb 21 2010

WAPO: Graham Has Done More Than Any Democrat to Advance Climate Change Legislation

Will we ever be rid of this guy?

For those concerned about warming, it’s time for a shift in emphasis. Fortunately, one has already been provided to them by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who has done more than any Democrat to keep climate legislation alive this year. His solution: skip the hurricanes and Himalayan glaciers and keep the argument on the hundreds of billions of dollars spent annually on foreign oil, some of that going to terrorists rather than to domestic job creation.

The Washington Post

There are people that claim they are sick and tired of the bipartisanship in D.C.  I personally see nothing necessarily wrong with partisanship in government because I tend to view reaching across the aisle as a selling out of your beliefs most of the time and what your constituents elected you for.  Graham has tried to play Mr. Uniter throughout his Senate career, but unfortunately keeps choosing the most inopportune times to do so.  First there was the big blow back on his support for McCain’s illegal immigration bill, the origin from whence came the nickname Grahamnesty.  Now he’s running around the country chapping his lips on the butt of Senator John Kerry (D-MA) over this climate change bill, much to the dismay of many South Carolinians.

Graham is correct that our heavy reliance on foreign oil is a serious issue, but we don’t need to cripple our economy through the Cap and Fraud bill to resolve that problem.  We just need to start drilling our own oil which we have plenty of.  We need to start building more nuclear power plants, which the Obama administration seems to be warming to.  Green energy investments in the private sector have been steadily growing as well.  We can do all of these things now without legislation.  None of them are illegal.

Instead of barking up the Cap and Fraud tree, Graham should simply be making a public push to pressure the administration to accept these other initiatives and move faster on them.  It’s highly unlikely that that the Waxman-Markey bill will ever become law at this point, but there has been talk of the Obama administration going around Congress and instead having the fascist EPA regulate green house gases.  This would essentially produce the same economic disastrous results on our nation by an unelected body, which in my opinion is unconstitutional.

A cap-and-trade system necessarily harms the economy because it is designed to raise the cost of energy. Given the current economic crisis, an expensive energy policy is a bad idea.

Almost all acts of economic production are powered by combusting fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas), a process that emits greenhouse gases thought to cause global warming. A cap-and-trade system is simply a mechanism to put a price on emissions in order to compel businesses and consumers to emit less. That is, it’s essentially an emissions tax. But greenhouse gas emissions are virtually synonymous with energy use, so it’s actually a roundabout energy tax. In fact, economists agree that the simplest, most efficient way to reduce emissions is a direct tax. Politicians, however, are terrified of the “t-word,” which is why they have embraced a cap-and-trade system.

The numbers are staggering. President Barack Obama’s recently unveiled cap-and-trade plan would raise $645 billion in revenue from the government-run emissions auctions over eight years. Everyone would feel the pinch. Businesses would compensate for higher production costs and diminished markets by slashing jobs. Consumers would have to pay more for energy and energy intensive goods.

Expensive energy is bad enough, but the real danger of a cap-and-trade policy is a global trade war. A cap-and-trade system would give a competitive advantage to industries in countries that aren’t subject to a de facto energy tax. Jobs would flow overseas, but so would emissions, a dynamic known as “carbon leakage.” To prevent this, a broad coalition of industry, labor, and environmental groups have expressed interest in a tariff that would tax the emissions content of imports from countries without stringent climate policies. Naturally, these countries would retaliate if such a tariff were enacted. Protectionism deepened the Great Depression, just as climate protectionism would worsen the current recession.

William Yeatman – Council on Foreign Relations

Share

2 responses so far

Feb 09 2010

Andrew Brock Must Hate Trees

Why else would he support two things that would drive the enviro-wackos even more wacko?

A Davie County Republican is urging fellow state lawmakers to stop wasting time and money on the state’s climate change commission and support energy policy he says will have a tangible impact on the state. Sen. Andrew Brock says the legislature should move to tap the massive natural gas reserve experts believe is sitting off the North Carolina coast.

“This whole thing was based on a false set of principles and false data,” says Brock, referencing e-mails leaked last year from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. Climate-change activists have relied on East Anglia data to justify massive government intervention, including caps on greenhouse gas emissions and limits on fossil fuel consumption. “There’s no credible evidence that supports that all the production by mankind is affecting the global climate.”

The four-term conservative is a longtime critic of the N.C. Legislative Commission on Global Climate Change, created in 2005. He’s also a longtime supporter of offshore drilling.

The Carolina Journal

Earth-hater. He probably still uses incandescent bulbs too, the jerk.

Share

No responses yet

Feb 09 2010

DeMint: “It’s going to keep snowing in DC until Al Gore cries ‘uncle’”

Senator Jim DeMint Twittered that across the World Wide Web this afternoon.  I was in Florida the past few days for work and as I was at the airport in Fort Myers this morning catching my flight home all of the flights to Washington D.C had been canceled due to the second brutal snow storm to hit them in a week.  D.C. already received about 30 inches a few days ago and they are expecting another 14 inches.  In fact, today’s Senate global warming (hehe) hearing has been canceled.

Man made climate change is the hoax of the century and most Americans now reject the belief that man is responsible for the weather patterns.  It’s conventional wisdom that you can only keep a secret for so long and so it’s no surprise that the scam is unraveling.  For the past five years we’ve seen record setting snow and colder temperatures across the country and around the world.  Folks in the north barely saw much of a summer this past year and even down here in the south we didn’t reach the usual number of sweltering dogs days we usually suffer through.  People only need to go outside to know that Al Gore is in serious need of a body cavity search compliments of Nurse Ratched.

It sure feels like the White Witch has taken hold of the throne and in the midst of her reign the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has pretty much lost all its credibility.  What many of us have known for years is finally being revealed.  They’ve been lying.  It began in November with the hacked emails from East Anglia University in England in which climate “scientists” admitted on paper that they had cherry picked evidence that supported their beliefs and excluded that which did not.  Just two weeks ago it got even more embarrassing when the world discovered that U.N. “scientists” based their climate change claims on a student dissertation and an article in a mountaineering magazine.  Liars and shysters and frauds, oh my! Despite these “errors” in judgment the IPCC insists its work is sound.  The universe is laughing behind their backs.

Let it be known that for the believers in man made climate change, it is their religion and Al Gore is the pope.

Share

6 responses so far

Next »